<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>s2ar.dev — blog</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/blog.html</link><description>Writing from s2ar.dev: reward integrity (starscry) and certified image compression (starlens) — every claim replayable.</description><item><title>The Refusal Nobody Measures</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/the-refusal-nobody-measures.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/the-refusal-nobody-measures.html</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starscry</category><description>The industry counts how often models comply with harmful requests and barely counts how often they refuse legitimate ones. Over-refusal is a real alignment failure — and its headline metric is a self-graded scalar that misranks its own subjects. The case for measuring it like a calibration.</description></item><item><title>Why a Certificate, Not a Compressor</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/why-a-certificate.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/why-a-certificate.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starlens</category><description>Images bill by dimensions, not bytes — and every existing answer to &#x27;how far can I shrink this?&#x27; is an aggregate. The case for a per-request, per-model, sealed fidelity certificate, priced as a share of the savings it proves.</description></item><item><title>Your JPEG Quality Knob Saves 0%</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/jpeg-knob-saves-zero.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/jpeg-knob-saves-zero.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starlens</category><description>We requantized to quality 25 and measured the token bill: exactly 0.0% saved. The knob the industry ships optimizes a number vision-LLMs don&#x27;t bill on — here is what they bill on instead, per provider.</description></item><item><title>The Average Is Not a Guarantee</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/average-is-not-a-guarantee.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/average-is-not-a-guarantee.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starlens</category><description>A pixel-error metric calls a 32-pixel-wide image &#x27;identical&#x27; while every model we tested stops reading at six times that size. On held-out content the naive policy silently loses 42–50% of answers — while reporting the best savings number on the board.</description></item><item><title>Certificates Name Their Model</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/certificates-name-their-model.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/certificates-name-their-model.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starlens</category><description>A compression that one model reads perfectly loses another 29% of its answers at the same rung. Cross-model transfer is one-directional — which is why a fidelity guarantee that doesn&#x27;t name its reader isn&#x27;t one.</description></item><item><title>Don&#x27;t Trust Me — Re-run the Seed</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/blog-post-2026-07.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/blog-post-2026-07.html</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starscry</category><description>A public RL environment whose reward a seeded search games in one simulation — and why the fix is to construct reward-hacks deterministically and ship the apparatus with the claim, not to detect them with a bigger model.</description></item><item><title>Run the Checker: Replayable Audits, Difficulty Certificates, and the Capability Floor</title><link>https://s2ar.dev/starscry/scientific-post-2026-07.html</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://s2ar.dev/starscry/scientific-post-2026-07.html</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><category>starscry</category><description>The platform plus a season of pointing the instruments at my own hypotheses: three refutations with named mechanisms, and two results — a capability floor and a solver-effort certificate — that survived the same guillotine.</description></item></channel></rss>
